School Improvement Plan
What is a School Improvement Plan?
A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.
Key Points of a SIP:
- Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
- Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
- Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.
Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.
Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.
District - School Improvement Plans

Skyline High School
School Improvement Plan
2024-2026
Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities
- What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
- What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
- What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality
ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities.
ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following:
- Institutional racism and ableism
- Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education
- Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)
- Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs
- Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs
- Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education
Reflection & Theory of Action
- What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
- What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
Backed by Data
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.
School-Based Action Plan
Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies with at least two from district-wide programs or systems listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.
Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:
- Implementation of New Curriculum or Courses. New curriculum is adopted annually. Full implementation requires 2- 4 years of support to establish calibrated learning outcomes, common learning experiences, integrated tiered supports and instruction, and delivery that is universally designed and culturally responsive. ISD Priority 2a,c
- Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a
- Grading for Equity. Implementation of grading practices so that [1] grades reflect mastery of key learning goals, [2] students receive feedback, reflect on their understanding, and are given an additional opportunity to demonstrate their learning; and [3] there is consistency and calibration of the measure of student learning. ISD Priority 2
- Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b
- Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning. ISD Priority 1
- Classroom-Based Intervention. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) in the classroom setting. ISD Priority 2b
- Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
- Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
| Action | Implementation | Impact: Evidence/Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusionary Practices |
Action: Increasing the percentage of students served in General Education classes.
Action: Strengthened collaboration within the Special Education Department and increased cross-collaboration with General Education colleagues.
Action: Adapting IEPs to reflect new educational settings
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Additional School Improvement Plan Components |
||
|
Family engagement ISD Priority 4 |
Champion’s List
Transfer Student/Family Meeting
Spartan Scholars
Middle School Transition Meetings
Skyline Family Liaison
Curriculum Night
Social Media
Amendment Meetings
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Technology Integration |
Access to 1:1
Canvas
Formative Assessment Tools
Embedding Accessibility Tools
Social Media
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
School Improvement Team & Procedure Information
|
Principal |
Keith Hennig |
|---|---|
|
SIP Team Members |
Kevin Adamo - AP Stephanie Anderson – Counselor Elisabeth Bacon – Library Alanah Baron – AP Mia Eldridge – Science Jenny Godley – Tech Andrew Guss - AP Savannah Gunning – PE Jane McIlwain – SPED Jois Ochea – World Language Molly Petersen – Humanities Spenser Phelan – IB Coordinator Dave Pitt – VAPA Samantha – ASB Megan Santos – Humanities BJ Sherman – CTE Allison Strait – AP Ami Williams – Math |
|
Supervisor Review |
Sherri Kokx – October 30, 2024 |
|
Site Council or PTSA Review |
October 17, 2024 |
|
School Board Review |
November 19, 2024 |