Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

Skyline High School

Skyline High School

School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for High School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies with at least two from district-wide programs or systems listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

  • Implementation of New Curriculum or Courses. New curriculum is adopted annually. Full implementation requires 2- 4 years of support to establish calibrated learning outcomes, common learning experiences, integrated tiered supports and instruction, and delivery that is universally designed and culturally responsive. ISD Priority 2a,c
  • Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a
  • Grading for Equity. Implementation of grading practices so that [1] grades reflect mastery of key learning goals, [2] students receive feedback, reflect on their understanding, and are given an additional opportunity to demonstrate their learning; and [3] there is consistency and calibration of the measure of student learning. ISD Priority 2
  • Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b
  • Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning. ISD Priority 1
  • Classroom-Based Intervention. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) in the classroom setting. ISD Priority 2b
  • Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
  • Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential. ISD Priority 2b

 

Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring
Inclusionary Practices

Action: Increasing the percentage of students served in General Education classes.

  • Reducing the number of LRCI stand-along courses from 8 to 4 (R/W Lab, SEL Learning Strategies and English 9/10/11/12).
  • Reducing the number of co-taught classes from 10 to a single co-taught class and adopting a peripatetic role for Special Education Teachers.

Action: Strengthened collaboration within the Special Education Department and increased cross-collaboration with General Education colleagues.

  • Presentation to BLT and Staff Professional Development session.
  • Weekly meetings for the Special Education Team
  • Providing support to General Education staff through meetings and ‘open house’ collaborative forums.

Action: Adapting IEPs to reflect new educational settings

  • Amendments of Specially Designed Instruction (SDI) service minutes for all students served with an IEP.
  • Purposeful collaboration leading to greater involvement of general education teachers in IEP goal setting.

Intended Impacts

  • Greatly reducing the number of special Education Classes and the tracking of students by creating more opportunities for students to participate in general education classes with their same-age peers and access to on-level curriculum, with accommodations and modifications as needed.
  • Enhancing teachers' understanding of the value of applying UDL strategies by exposing them to a wider range of student learning challenges.
  • The diverse classroom environment fosters awareness and understanding of learning differences among the general education student population.
  • A more effective use of special educator resources through the provision of flexible and responsive support to students in both core and elective classes.
  • Encouraging the application of student skills across all of their classes, rather than limiting it to a special education setting.

Key Data

  • Ensuring a common understanding of Inclusionary practice and defining the roles and responsibilities of general education and special education staff.
  • Compiling a comprehensive list of frequently asked questions/responses to provide a resource for all departments.
  • Consistent monitoring of student progress, identifying students of concern, and implementing early intervention with the evaluation of outcomes.

  • Collaboration on best practice and the implementation of Special Services directives.

  • Offering strategies and support to general education staff to help them interpret IEPs in relation to their class content.

  • Collaborating on modifications of materials and teaching strategies to ensure student access to on-level curriculum.

  • Historically, SDI Service minutes were calculated according to’ class minutes’ rather than focusing on the actual time a student was directly supported by special education staff. The shift in special educator practice provides a more accurate account of the time required to meet a student’s individual learning needs (progress toward their IEP goals). Therefore, amendments are required to adjust service minutes accordingly.

  • With increased inclusion in general education classes, a more dynamic learning experience is driving the need for IEP goals to better align with the content being taught. Closer collaboration between special education and general education teachers is leading to the creation of more thoughtful and relevant IEP goals.

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Champion’s List

  • Key staff members who advocate for and build positive relationships with students who are identified as needing additional guidance and encouragement.
  • Champions check-in with their assigned student/family providing personalized support to help them succeed academically, behaviorally and social/emotionally.

Transfer Student/Family Meeting

  • Welcoming new students/families to Skyline.
  • Provide an overview of our academic and extracurricular opportunities and addressing any specific needs or concerns

Spartan Scholars

  • Provide targeted students/families with early exposure to high school routines and support systems before the school year begins.
  • Areas of focus include academic preparation, orientation activities and social-emotional learning to ease the transition and build confidence for a successful high school experience.

Middle School Transition Meetings

  • Partner with middle school administration to gather relevant information surrounding student needs.
  • Reach out to families to collaborate on creating a smooth transition to high school.

Skyline Family Liaison

  • Welcome email sent to families the first week of school. Email outlines support and resources the Family Liaison can provide students/families.
  • Provides support for families at school events such as Curriculum Night.

Curriculum Night

  • Families meet teachers, learn about course content, expectations, academic goals for the year and helping students/families understand how to support their student’s learning.
  • Skyline’s Family Liaison partnered with families to provide

Social Media

  • Enhance family engagement by providing timely updates, showcasing student achievements and sharing important school information.

Amendment Meetings

  • Meeting with student/families to ensure they receive the appropriate SDI needed to meet their academic goals.
  • These meetings allow case managers an opportunity to meet with student/families to collaborate and make necessary adjustments to support our inclusive teaching/learning model.

Intended Impacts

  • Close academic and attendance gaps for BIPOC and SWD students.

Key Data

  • Following each grading period (i.e., MT1, Q1, MT2, S1, etc.) the MTSS Team will disaggregate and analyze academic and attendance data.

Technology Integration

Access to 1:1

  • Ensured all students received a school issued laptop and access to educational platforms utilized during teaching and learning.

Canvas

  • Engage students by providing a centralized location for assignments, discussions and resources.
  • Canvas allows for differentiated instruction and multiple means of representation, catering to diverse learning needs.

Formative Assessment Tools

  • Kahoot!, Quizizz, Google Forms, Curipod enable quick formative assessments.
  • Platforms provide instant feedback to both students and teachers, fostering self-monitoring and reflection.

Embedding Accessibility Tools

  • Hand Translators
  • Closed Captioning
  • Sound Filed System

Social Media

  • Enhance family engagement by providing timely updates, showcasing student achievements and sharing important school information.

Intended Impacts

  • Increased engagement and motivation
  • Personalized learning
  • Collaboration and Communication
  • Access and Inclusivity

Key Data

  • Formative/summative assessments delivered through technology platforms
  • Canvas student engagement data (i.e., login tracking, assignment submission, etc.)
  • Evaluations/Observations (i.e., integrating of technology, teacher self-reflection)

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

Keith Hennig

SIP Team Members

Kevin Adamo - AP

Stephanie Anderson – Counselor Elisabeth Bacon – Library

Alanah Baron – AP Mia Eldridge – Science Jenny Godley – Tech Andrew Guss - AP

Savannah Gunning – PE Jane McIlwain – SPED

Jois Ochea – World Language Molly Petersen – Humanities Spenser Phelan – IB Coordinator Dave Pitt – VAPA

Samantha – ASB

Megan Santos – Humanities BJ Sherman – CTE

Allison Strait – AP Ami Williams – Math

Supervisor Review

Sherri Kokx – October 30, 2024

Site Council or PTSA Review

October 17, 2024

School Board Review

November 19, 2024